The discourse surrounding college athletics is increasingly dominated by superficial trends: the hiring of high-profile celebrity coaches, headline-grabbing transfer portal decisions, and the relentless pursuit of opportunities tied to name, image, and likeness (NIL). These conversations often prioritize media-driven narratives and short-term gains, overshadowing the sustained excellence of programs that succeed through adherence to foundational principles.
Consider the case of a perennial Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) powerhouse, such as North Dakota State University. This program has consistently outperformed its competition, maintaining roster stability while avoiding a heavy reliance on transfers. Such success underscores the value of long-term development, disciplined culture, and a commitment to brand integrity—an approach that far outweighs the fleeting benefits of sensationalist strategies.
Championship programs are not built overnight. Achieving true excellence requires resisting the allure of quick fixes, the compulsion to prioritize social media impressions, and the temptation to appease fan expectations rooted in a culture of instant gratification. This is not an indictment of any single program but a critique of the broader landscape, which often misinterprets what it takes to develop athletes, build resilient programs, and sustain competitive success at the highest levels.
An analysis of six FCS football programs offers critical insights into recruiting philosophies and their impact on performance. The review included data on roster sizes, the number of transfer athletes, the percentage of rosters composed of transfers, and final FCS rankings. The findings indicate no positive correlation between an increased reliance on transfer athletes and a program’s ability to win an FCS national title or establish a championship-caliber brand. Instead, the evidence suggests that greater emphasis should be placed on program continuity rather than acquisitions through the transfer portal.
This analysis examined the rosters of FCS National Champions, National Runner-ups, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) National Champions, HBCU National Runner-ups, and two additional FCS programs. The review compared national rankings, the percentage of transfers on each roster, and the tenure of head coaches. Key findings include:
- Transfer Percentage and Final FCS Ranking (AFCA): A strong positive correlation (r = 0.778) exists, indicating that a higher proportion of transfers is associated with worse rankings (higher numerical values).
- Head Coach Tenure and Final FCS Ranking: A moderate negative correlation (r = -0.635) suggests that teams with longer-tenured head coaches tend to achieve better rankings (lower numerical values).
- Head Coach Tenure and Transfer Percentage: A weak negative correlation (r = -0.429) indicates that teams with longer-tenured coaches generally have a lower percentage of transfers.
These findings reinforce the notion that stability in coaching leadership contributes to improved team performance and reduced dependence on transfers. Below is a summary of the roster review:
| Team | Total Roster Count | Total Transfer Count | Transfer % of Team | Final FCS Ranking (AFCA) | Current Head Coach Tenure (Years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota State | 108 | 14 | 13.0% | 3 | 2 |
| South Carolina State | 100 | 34 | 34.0% | 20 | 1 |
| Florida A&M University | 104 | 68 | 65.4% | – | 1 |
| Jackson State University | 101 | 61 | 60.4% | 15 | 2 |
| North Dakota State University | 106 | 16 | 15.1% | 1 | 2 |
| Montana State University | 114 | 12 | 10.5% | 2 | 4 |
The results suggest that programs heavily reliant on transfer athletes may achieve moderate success and relevance but struggle to reach the pinnacle of sustained excellence. For FCS programs, the optimal strategy involves granting head coaches sufficient time to build rosters, enhance program continuity, and strengthen their personal and organizational brand. This approach not only attracts top high school talent but also increases the years athletes spend within the program’s system, fostering long-term success.